Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:46:14 +0800 (PHT)
From: "Alan G. Alegre" <alalegre@fma.ph>
Subject: [communication 1150] [Fwd: Thailand:  Supinya vs. Shin Corp.-- a libel case that raises      concern for human rights, freedom of expression and media ownership]
To: communication@wsisasia.org
Message-Id: <15796.208.147.1.5.1088664374.squirrel@mail.fma.ph>
X-Mail-Count: 01150


---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: [Fwd: Thailand:  Supinya vs. Shin Corp.-- a libel case that
raises concern for human rights, freedom of expression and media
ownership] From:    ubonrat@isai.or.id
Date:    Tue, June 29, 2004 2:12 pm
To:      jinpeili@yahoo.com
         supinya40@yahoo.com
         alalegre@fma.ph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Thailand:  Supinya vs. Shin Corp.-- a libel case that raises
concern for human rights, freedom of expression and media ownershipFrom:
"David Lin" <DL@wacc.org.uk> Date: Sat, June 26, 2004 12:48 am
To: <forum@arwacc.org>

				Dear AR-WACC Online Participants,

				More connection of connections, support
of supports -- Asia Human Rights Commission (AHRC), based in Hong Kong,
released the following appeal on its homepage on 21 June, 2004.  Ms.
Supinya Klangnarong is a former WACC scholar who studied in University of
Westminster in 2001. Now she's sued by the Shin Corp. in Thailand for
libel. It's a case that raises concern for human rights, freedom of
expression, and for media conglomerate's domination in a country like
Thailand.

				You may want to show support to Supinya
by following the AHRC's appeal letter below.  A picture of her can be
found in the "Media Gallery" link of AR-WACC homepage www.arwacc.org.

				Regards.

				David Lin
				Online Moderator

				AHRC's appeal appears from here ::::>


				THAILAND: Human rights defender faces
preliminary decision in libel case

				URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT
ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION

				ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT
APPEALS PROGRAM

				21 June 2004


---------------------------------------------------------------------
				UA-73-2004: THAILAND: Human rights
defender faces preliminary decision in libel case

				THAILAND: Freedom of speech;
Democratization of media; Human rights defenders

---------------------------------------------------------------------

				Dear friends,

				The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
wishes to draw attention to the fact that tomorrow, June 22, the
preliminary decision will be given in a civil suit of extreme importance
for all persons concerned with freedom of speech in Thailand. The case is
a libel suit filed by Shin Corp, Thailand's biggest
telecommunications and media company, which is owned by the family of the
Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, against Ms Supinya Klangnarong,
Secretary General of the Campaign for Popular Media Reform. The libel case
was issued after Ms Supinya observed that Shin Corp's profits have
skyrocketed since Mr Thaksin became Prime Minister.

				The case is deeply disturbing as Ms
Supinya's remarks were made out of concern for public interest in issues
of media ownership and freedom of speech in Thailand. If Shin Corp is
given leave to proceed with the suit, it will legitimate the use of the
judicial system in Thailand as a means to silence public dissent and
further intimidate Thailand's civil sector, which has already been
subjected to numerous threats and attacks in recent years.

				AHRC calls for you to send letters, make
emails and phone calls to Shin Corp's Boonklee Plangsiri, Chairman of the
Group Executive Committeem, asking Shin Corp to withdraw the case against
Ms Supinya. You may also send letters of support to Ms Supinya directly.

				Urgent Appeals Desk
				Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)

-----------------------------------------------------------

				DETAILED INFORMATION:

				On 16 July 2003, the Thai Post newspaper
published an article in which Ms Supinya Klangnarong, Secretary General of
the Campaign for Popular Media Reform (CPMR), observed that the profits of
Shin Corp had increased enormously since its founder, Mr Thaksin
Shinawatra, had become Prime Minister of Thailand. In the
article, Ms Supinya pointed out that since Mr Thaksin founded his Thai Rak
Thai political party five years earlier, his company's profits had
increased four times over, and were projected to increase many times
still. She gave details-based upon sound research-of how Mr Thaksin had
used the political system to manipulate business in favour of Shin Corp.
She also noted that Shin Corp's business interests were all in public
communications-mobile phones, satellite transmissions and television-and
therefore matters over which there should be public debate as matters of
national concern. Additionally, she pointed out that the profits from Shin
Corp were being channelled back into the Thai Rak Thai company,
effectively integrating Mr Thaksin's political and commercial interests
into a single highly powerful enterprise.

				After the report was released, Shin Corp
filed a libel suit for about ten million Thai Baht (US2,000). The case has
been in preliminary hearings since 1 December 2003, and the court will
decide on whether or not the case may proceed to the full court. If Shin
Corp succeeds in taking the case to the next stage, it will have serious
implications for Ms Supinya personally, and for efforts to democratize
media in Thailand overall. For Ms Supinya, it will hamper her efforts to
lead the campaign for desperately needed and long-overdue media reform in
the country, as her time and resources will be spent fighting an arduous
court battle. For others in the country concerned with freedom of speech
and media reform it will legitimate methods used by the government and
powerful commercial interests to pursue persons through the courts who
have spoken against them out of concern for the public good and free
expression.

				It should be noted that only Shin Corp
has sued Ms Supinya. Neither the Prime Minister nor his Thai Rak Thai
party has denied her allegations that a connection exists between Mr
Thaksin's political and commercial enterprises.


				ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

				The television and radio media in
Thailand have been under a government and military monopoly since their
introduction to the country. Although the new Constitution of Thailand
introduced in 1997 set in place provisions for the democratization of
these media, these provisions have not been realized. The only
television station not controlled by the government or military is owned
by Shin Corp. Radio stations have been started by local communities, but
the government has threatened them with closure on the grounds they are
"illegal". In fact it is the government itself that has failed to
introduce a licensing regime in accordance with the new Constitution.
There is what the CPMR has identified as a new media monopoly emerging
between the commercial and government sectors, as media concessions are
issued to Shin Corp and other businesses close to senior politicians,
thereby defeating the purpose of the constitutional reforms. Shin Corp in
particular has totally dominated all sectors of the commercial media in
Thailand, as it owns 24 companies running telecommunications,
television, radio, internet, satellite and other communications
throughout the country, and even into neighbouring Cambodia, Laos and
Burma. The result is that outside a limited number of newspapers and low
distribution journals, there remains virtually no independent media in
Thailand, thereby greatly damaging the prospects for opening discussion on
serious violations of human rights and other concerns currently faced by
the people there. In particular, there are no avenues for the
expression of popular concerns from the local level in Thailand, and as
such the country continues to be dominated by an elite urban-centred
discourse inimical to the furtherance of human rights in the country.

				Ms Supinya set up the CPMR to advocate
media reform and counter these trends on the basis of provisions in the
new Constitution intended to liberalise and democratize electronic media
in Thailand. As the spokesperson and leading figure of this forerunning
organization for media reform in Thailand she poses a threat to those who
would see a government and big business monopoly

				For other reports on the case and
background, see the following sites:
				ABC (Australia) News:
http://www.abcnews.net.au/asiapacific/location/asia/GAPLocAsiaStories_10
06728.htm
				Asia Media:
http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=5363
				Committee to Protect Journalists:
http://www.cpj.org/attacks03/asia03/thai.html
				CorpWatch:
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=9333
				WACC:
http://www.wacc.org.uk/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=1412

				SUGGESTED ACTION:
				Please phone call or send a
letter/fax/email to the Shin Corporation and demand them to drop the suit
filed against Ms Supinya Klangnarong. AHRC suggests you to
intervene into this case as quickly as possible as the preliminary
decision about this case will be given in a civil suit on 22 June 2004
(tomorrow).

				Sample letter:

				Mr. Boonklee Plangsiri
				Chairman of the Group Executive
Committee
				Shin Corporation Plc.
				414 Phaholyothin Road
				Samsennai, Phayathai
				Bangkok 10400
				Thailand

				Dear Mr. Boonklee Plangsiri,

				Re: THAILAND: Shin Corp. Libel case
against Ms Supinya Klangnarong

				As a person concerned with freedom of
speech in Thailand, I strongly urge the Shin Corporation to drop the suit
filed against Ms Supinya Klangnarong, Secretary General of the Campaign
for Popular Media Reform (CPMR).

				According to the information I have
received, the preliminary decision will be given in a civil suit filed by
your Shin Corp against Ms Supinya Klangnarong on 22 June 2004. The libel
case was filed after Ms Supinya observed that Shin Corp's profits have
skyrocketed since Mr Thaksin Shinawatra became Prime Minister.

				I want to bring to your attention that
her case is not merely a personal matter but is related to the
democratization of media in Thailand overall. In fact, her activity for
long-overdue media reform is linked to the realization of the new
Constitution of Thailand introduced in 1997, which set in place
provisions for the democratization of these media. However, until now the
only television station not controlled by the government or military is
owned by Shin Corp. Similarly, radio stations that have been started by
local communities have been threatened by the government with closure on
the grounds that they are "illegal". Under these circumstances, Ms Supinya
has identified Shin Corp as a new media monopoly emerging
between the commercial and government sectors, as media concessions are
issued to Shin Corp and other businesses close to senior politicians,
thereby defeating the purpose of the constitutional reforms.

				Media reform on the basis of provisions
in the new Constitution is essential for opening discussion on serious
violations of human rights and other concerns currently faced by the
people in Thailand. If the case will be taken to the next stage, this will
have serious implications not only for Ms Supinya personally, but for all
efforts to democratize media in Thailand.

				Therefore, I strongly urge the Shin
Corp. to drop the suit against Ms Supinya immediately. As a media
corporation you have a social responsibility to uphold freedom of
speech, and therefore I request you to take part in media reform and
create a better environment for democracy.

				Yours sincerely


				-------------------------

				PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

				Mr Boonklee Plangsiri
				Chairman of the Group Executive
Committee
				Shin Corporation Plc.
				414 Phaholyothin Road
				Samsennai, Phayathai,
				Bangkok 10400
				Thailand
				Tel:  (662) 299-5000
				Fax: (662) 271-1058
				E-mail: investor@shincorp.com

				PLEASE SEND COPIES TO:

				1. Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra
				Prime Minister
				Government house,
				Pitsanulok Road, Dusit District,
				Bangkok 10300
				THAILAND
				Fax: +66 2 282 8631
				Email: thaksin@thaigov.go.th,
govspkman@mozart.inet.co.th

				2. Mrs. Sudarat Keyuraphan
				Deputy Leader
				Thai Rak Thai Party
				237/2 Ratchawithi Road
				Suan Chitralada
				Dusit, Bangkok 10300
				THAILAND
				Tel: (662) 668-2000
				Fax: (662) 668-6000
				Email: sudarat@sudarat.com,
spokesman@thairakthai.or.th

				3. Professor Saneh Chamarik
				Chairperson
				The National Human Rights Commission of
Thailand
				422 Phya Thai Road
				Pathurn Wan District
				Bangkok 10300
				THAILAND
				Fax: 662 219 2940
				Email: commission@nhrc.or.th

				4. Ms. Hina Jilani
				UN Sepcial Represetative of the
Secretaary-General on Human Rights Defenders
				C/o OHCHR-UNOG, 1211 Geneva 10,
				SWITZERLAND
				Fax: +41 22 917 9006

				MESSAGES OF SUPPORT MAY ALSO BE SENT TO:

				Supinya Klangnarong
				Secretary General
				CPMR
				409 Soi Ratchada 14
				Huay Kwang
				Bangkok 10320
				THAILAND
				Tel & Fax: +66 2 691 0437 to 0439
				Email: cpmr40@hotmail.com


				Thank you.

				Urgent Appeals Programme
				Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)


				Posted on 2004-06-21
				Back to [2004 Urgent Appeal]


http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2004/706

				Asian Human Rights Commission






	

1150_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)