Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:58:49 +0900
From: Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>
Subject: [communication 792] Re: URGENT applications to Prepcom 3 and decisions to be taken
To: communication@wsisasia.org
Cc: bureau@geneva2003.org
Message-Id: <p0510031cbb5d67ad53ed@[192.168.11.3]>
In-Reply-To: <001901c36003$d6448910$de1d8ea1@kryssq1o9vc6nq>
References: <009a01c35ff7$b4928d50$6b75063d@kryssq1o9vc6nq> <1060603090.3f3784d21f758@tiesmail.itu.ch> <001901c36003$d6448910$de1d8ea1@kryssq1o9vc6nq>
X-Mail-Count: 00792

>Hi Claire,
>
>Thanks for this. Where is the list of organisations that you mentioned under
>point 1?


that must be the CS organizations that sent comments on the working 
documents, declaration and action plan? I hope this won't be the only 
"qualifications" of this type that will be considered.

The bureau has to have criteria for allocating funds, and something 
like this shows a demonstrable level of interest.  But it's too 
narrow.  I think we need to suggest that other more inclusive and 
more regionally oriented show of interest is used -- for example 
participation in regional preparatory meetings, contributions to 
meetings that themselves made contributions to regional processes (in 
our region that would include the meetings in Bangkok -- Forum Asian 
and ACSF.)

Thanks,

Adam


>Thanks again!
>
>angela
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <claire.chombeau@ties.itu.int>
>To: <bureau@geneva2003.org>; <amkt@apcwomen.org>
>Cc: <communication@wsisasia.org>
>Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:58 PM
>Subject: Re: URGENT applications to Prepcom 3 and decisions to be taken
>
>
>>  Dear Angela,
>>
>>  Other criterias:
>>
>>  Our main sponsor is imposing the condition that fellowships only be given
>to
>>  participants from LDCs, so you must take this into account.
>>
>>  The average cost of a fellowship for 12 days plus travel (14 to 26
>September)
>>  for the conference in Geneva is 5,500CHF.
>>
>>  In the selection of the fellowship please take into consideration the
>following
>>  elements:
>>  1. The PrepCom3's main objective is to finalise the Plan of Action.  In
>>  attributing fellowships, priority will be given to those experts, from
>>  accredited organisations, who have contributed to the Draft Plan of Action
>and
>>  who's contribution will be, or is, acknowledged in said document.  You
>will find
>>  below a list of organisations that have made a contribution.
>>  2. Members of the Bureau (one per family) who live outside Geneva should
>be
>>  included in the fellowships because no additional funding is available to
>cover
>>  their travel and accommodation.
>>  3. The duration of the PrepCom is two weeks but it may not be possible or
>>  appropriate for all the fellows to spend two full weeks in Geneva,
>especially if
>>  their field of expertise is covered in the first week of the negotiations.
>>
>>  Regards,
>>
>>  Claire
>>
>>  Quoting RunningToddler <amkt@apcwomen.org>:
>>
>>  > Hello everyone,
>>  >
>>  > I've just received the final list of applications for fellowships. I'm
>>  > repeating most of what I said in an earlier e-mail but this time, the
>list of
>>  > names for fellowships have been updated. We need to come to a decision
>on
>  > > this.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > To help us in this decision-making and to ensure fair and open
>processes, I'm
>  > > putting forward the criteria that was proposed under the Civil Society
>  > > Facility Fund document. The text reads:
>>  >
>>  > Fellowships for participation in the Summit process
>>  > A number of fellowships will be made available to civil society
>entities, to
>>  > ensure travel and accommodation. As mentioned in Section 3 above,
>priority
>>  > will be given to participants coming from LDCs (less developing
>countries) or
>>  > representing other groups (least developed countries, developing
>countries,
>>  > countries in transition, disabled persons, youth, women, older people,
>>  > indigenous people, displaced persons, refugees, etc.).
>>  >
>>  > Selection criteria:
>>  >   1.. accreditation
>>  >   2.. diversity of stakeholders (families) representation
>>  >   3.. diversity of views on the themes/issues of the Summit
>>  >   4.. individuals, who have personally and actively been involved in a
>WSIS
>>  > consultation process related to WSIS activities
>>  >   5.. balancing the needs of displaced persons and refugee groups
>>  >   6.. gender equity and equality
>>  >   7.. balanced gender, geographical/country representation
>>  >   8.. balanced rural-urban representation, with an emphasis for rural
>and
>>  > urban poor groups
>>  >   9.. bottom-up relevance/grassroots links
>>  > In addition, we are also adding the criteria of persons or groups who
>are
>>  > planning to do work and/or hold events at the Summit itself. And we
>could
>>  > expand this to include doing work at national level and
>ensuring/facilitating
>>  > wider participation. The Civil Society Facility Fund is aiming to
>provide
>>  > funds for distance participation, showcasing of projects and networking,
>>  > awareness-raising and advocacy at naitonal, regional and global levels.
>>  > Please read the document again if you've forgotten the four areas of
>priority
>>  > for funding. You can find this on the www.geneva2003.org website.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Currently (this list is not updated), the names which are on record for
>>  > fellowships from the Asia Pacific are:
>>  >
>>  > BANGLADESH
>>  > Mansur Rahman, Bangladesh, Action on Disability and Development (People
>with
>>  > Disabilities family)
>>  > Reza Salim, Bangladesh, Bangladesh Friendship Education Society
>>  > Dulal Biswas, Bangladesh, National Federation of Youth Organisations in
>>  > Bangladesh (Youth family)
>>  > Mohammad Ahsan, Bangladesh, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  > Ahmed Swapan Mahmud, Bangladesh, Voices for Interactive Choice and
>>  > Empowerment
>>  >
>>  > CHINA
>>  > Peng Yang, China, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  >
>>  > INDIA
>>  > Vivek Agrawal, India, Centre for Development Communication
>>  > Arunachalam Prabaharan, India, Public Action
>>  > Ambruta Unkule, India, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  > Aditi Uptat, India, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  > Varun Puri, India, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  > Sonali Unkule, India, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  > Uday Rosario, India, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  > Kartik Nagarkatti, India, Taking IT Global (Youth family)
>>  >
>>  > MALAYSIA
>>  > Varsha Kantilal Ajmera, Malaysia, World Youth Foundation (NGO family)
>>  > Angela M. Kuga Thas, Malaysia, APC WNSP (CSB alternate focal point, Asia
>>  > Pacific)
>>  >
>>  > NEPAL
>>  > Kesh Bahadur Pariyar, Nepal, Literary Academy for Dalip of Nepal
>>  >
>>  > PAKISTAN
>>  > Kausar Parveen, Pakistan, Peace Worldwide (Academia and Education
>family)
>>  >
>>  > PHILIPPINES
>>  > Robert Sagun, Philippines, Taking IT Global (Youth family; nominated by
>Youth
>>  > focal point)
>>  > Chat Garcia Ramilo, Philippines, APC (Gender family)
>>  > Susanna George, Philippines, Isis International Manila (Gender family)
>>  > Raijeli Nicole, Philippines, Isis International Manila (Gender family)
>>  > Mavic Victoria Belleza, Philippines, Isis International Manila (Gender
>>  > family)
>>  > Alan G. Alegre, Philippines, Association for Progressive Communication
>(CSB
>>  > focal point, Asia Pacific)
>>  >
>>  > SRI LANKA
>>  >
>>  > Dilanthe Withanage, Sri Lanka, Worldview International Foundation (NGO
>>  > family)
>>  >
>>  > THAILAND
>>  > Sunit Shrestha, Thailand, Taking IT Global (Youth family, nominated by
>Youth
>>  > focal point)
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > IMPORTANT: Organisations named are those who have accreditation to the
>WSIS
>>  > process. These applicants could also be representing other organisations
>>  > besides those accredited.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > As you can see from the above, none have applied from the Pacific. I've
>taken
>>  > the liberty of trying to get the Rural Development Volunteers
>Association to
>>  > participate in Prepcom 3 from Solomon Islands. The possible candidate
>would
>>  > be David Leeming. He will have to come under another organisation's
>>  > accreditation as his organisation doesn't have accreditation yet. I feel
>that
>>  > representation from the Pacific is important if we want to mobilise
>around
>>  > any future activities in relation to WSIS.
>>  >
>>  > I suggest we put forward ten names in order of priority. Please take
>note
>>  > that one nomination needs to be for the CSB Asia Pacific focal point.
>First
>>  > five to be funded, and second five if funds are available.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > We would like to hear from as many people as possible. Please remember
>to use
>>  > the criteria given above.
>>  >
>>  > Warm regards,
>>  >
>>  > Angela
>>
>>
>>
>>


--