----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 =
8:13 PM
Subject: [communication 781] =
Re: Fw:=20
John's note on Civil Society Plenary
Dear Angela,
I am sorry =
that I did=20
not did not respond to this before. Isis has infact gone ahead with =
the NGO=20
Gender Strategies Working Group to endorse the five points that Sean =
proposed=20
with some slight modification to Point 3. We do think it is =
vital at=20
this point to support Sean's proposal since the Civil Society =
Plenary is=20
an important space to maintain in as democratic a space as =
possible. I=20
would encourage the AP Caucus to give support to Sean's =
call.
More=20
later,
Susanna
At 09:32 AM 7/25/2003 +0800, you =
wrote:
Hello=20
everyone,
I thought it best to share this with the caucus. I think =
it's=20
important to understand the context and I will be next forwarding =
Sean's=20
five points as mentioned in his e-mail below. I seek your views on =
this=20
matter and if as Asia Pacific, we would like to support Sean's=20
call.
Warm regards,
Angela
-----=20
Original Message -----
From: Sean=20
O Siochru
To: bureau@geneva2003.org ; bureau@wsis-cs.org =
Sent:=20
Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:44 PM
Subject: John's note on =
Civil=20
Society Plenary
To: Members of the Bureau,
I =
totally=20
agree with Renata that we need to build on trust in the =
Bureau. But=20
this is also why I believe that John Gagain is severely out of order =
in the=20
note he has sent around to Bureau members, to the CS Plenary List =
and to the=20
Content Themes Group list. I do not at all question his =
motives,=20
but trust also involves respecting previous decisions and working =
from the=20
same basics.
John has stated in no uncertain terms (copied =
below)=20
that he believes that the Civil Society Plenary, as it has been =
constituted=20
at WSIS meetings, does not in fact exist, and that (if it did) it =
has no=20
authority to take decisions on behalf of civil society.
I =
was not at=20
the Bureau meeting and have not seen the minutes, so I cannot =
comment on the=20
issue of Chairing the Bureau. But I do believe that it is =
entirely out=20
of order for any member, let alone a purported Co-Chairperson, of =
the Civil=20
Society Bureau to claim that the entity from which the Bureau =
ultimately=20
derives its legitimacy does not exist.
Such a =
statement,=20
especially made so publicly by the purported Chair of the Bureau, is =
highly=20
provocative and risks discrediting the entire efforts of civil =
society to=20
develop a credible and coherent presence at the WSIS.
I =
believe that=20
the Bureau must disassociate ourselves clearly from this statement, =
in=20
equally certain terms. I greatly regret that John has sent =
this=20
around, and I believe it will inevitably damage the credibility of =
the=20
Bureau in the eyes of civil society.
In another note that I =
am=20
sending in response to John on the other lists, I note five points =
that I=20
thought had been agreed between us all. I believe that the =
Bureau must=20
also affirm these, or similar. We must work from the same =
assumptions if we,=20
and civil society as a whole, is to retain credibility. =
Sean=20
John wrote (my bold):
- CS Information Session and Debriefing There does not exist =
a forum=20
at the WSIS referred to as "Civil Society Plenary", nor was there =
ever one=20
at any other U.N. sponsored Summit in the past. A Plenary =
signifies a=20
fixed group of members or member states and the actual official =
definition=20
is: 1. Complete in all respects, unlimited or full: a diplomat =
with=20
plenary powers, 2. Fully attended by all qualified members: a =
plenary=20
session of the council. As you can see, Civil Society =
does not=20
fulfill this definition or its prerequisites. =20
- ...=20
- ... as I mention above, there is no CS Plenary; and =
especially not=20
one that makes decisions on behalf of Civil Society. =
This idea=20
would never work especially due to the fact that the composition =
of Civil=20
Society at the WSIS is always changing from meeting-to-meeting,=20
session-to-session; and is never consistent. Please see the=20
definition of Plenary above.
=20
=
___________________________________________________
=
Se=E1n=20
=D3 Siochr=FA Central office: tel: =
+353 1 473=20
0599 fax: +353 1 473 0597
NEXUS=20
Research Mobile: +353 87 20 48 150
14 =
Eaton=20
Brae Direct office tel: +353 1 272 =
0739 =20
fax: +353 1 272 0034=20
=
Shankill &=
nbsp;
Co.=20
=
Dublin &nb=
sp; e-mail:=20
=
sean@nexus.ie
Ireland &nb=
sp; &=
nbsp; Web=20
site: http://www.iol.ie/nexus"=20
eudora=3D"autourl">http://www.iol.ie/nexus
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG=20
anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com/"=20
eudora=3D"autourl">http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.502 =
/ Virus=20
Database: 300 - Release Date:=20
18/07/2003