----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 =
11:14=20
AM
Subject: URGENT update on =
funding,=20
applications to Prepcom 3 and next steps
Hello everyone,
As promised, we had some =
discussions around=20
funding for Prepcom 3 and the selection committee comprises the five =
regional focal points from the bureau. This means that the Asia =
Pacific=20
caucus does have a say over who gets funding and who doesn't. =
To help=20
us in this decision-making and to ensure fair and open processes, =
I'm=20
putting forward the criteria that was proposed under the Civil =
Society=20
Facility Fund document. The text reads:
Fellowships for participation in =
the Summit=20
process
A number of fellowships will be =
made available=20
to civil society entities, to ensure travel and accommodation. As =
mentioned=20
in Section 3 above, priority will be given to participants coming =
from LDCs=20
(less developing countries) or representing other groups (least =
developed=20
countries, developing countries, countries in transition, disabled =
persons,=20
youth, women, older people, indigenous people, displaced persons, =
refugees,=20
etc.).
Selection criteria:
- accreditation=20
- diversity of stakeholders =
(families)=20
representation=20
- diversity of views on the =
themes/issues of the=20
Summit=20
- individuals, who have personally =
and actively=20
been involved in a WSIS consultation process related to WSIS=20
activities=20
- balancing the needs of displaced =
persons and=20
refugee groups=20
- gender equity and equality=20
- balanced gender, =
geographical/country=20
representation=20
- balanced rural-urban =
representation, with an=20
emphasis for rural and urban poor groups=20
- bottom-up relevance/grassroots=20
links
In addition, we are also adding the =
criteria of=20
persons or groups who are planning to do work and/or hold events at =
the=20
Summit itself. And we could expand this to include doing work at =
national=20
level and ensuring/facilitating wider participation. The Civil =
Society=20
Facility Fund is aiming to provide funds for distance participation, =
showcasing of projects and networking, awareness-raising and =
advocacy at=20
naitonal, regional and global levels. Please read the document again =
if=20
you've forgotten the four areas of priority for funding. You can =
find this=20
on the www.geneva2003.org=20">http://www.geneva2003.org">www.geneva2003.org=20
website.
Currently (this list is not =
updated), the names=20
which are on record for fellowships from the Asia Pacific =
are:
BANGLADESH
Mansur Rahman, Bangladesh, Action =
on Disability=20
and Development (People with Disabilities family)
Reza Salim, Bangladesh, Bangladesh =
Friendship=20
Education Society
Dulal Biswas, Bangladesh, National =
Federation=20
of Youth Organisations in Bangladesh (Youth family)
Mohammad Ahsan, Bangladesh, Taking =
IT Global=20
(Youth family)
Ahmed Swapan Mahmud, Bangladesh, Voices for Interactive Choice =
and=20
Empowerment
CHINA
Peng Yang, China, Taking IT Global =
(Youth=20
family)
INDIA
Vivek Agrawal, India, Centre for =
Development=20
Communication
Arunachalam Prabaharan, India, =
Public=20
Action
Ambruta Unkule, India, Taking IT =
Global (Youth=20
family)
Aditi Uptat, India, Taking IT =
Global (Youth=20
family)
Varun Puri, India, Taking IT Global =
(Youth=20
family)
Sonali Unkule, India, Taking IT =
Global (Youth=20
family)
Uday Rosario, India, Taking IT =
Global (Youth=20
family)
Kartik Nagarkatti, India, Taking IT =
Global=20
(Youth family)
MALAYSIA
Varsha Kantilal Ajmera, Malaysia, =
World Youth=20
Foundation (NGO family)
NEPAL
Kesh Bahadur Pariyar, Nepal, =
Literary Academy=20
for Dalip of Nepal
PAKISTAN
Kausar Parveen, Pakistan, Peace =
Worldwide=20
(Academia and Education family)
PHILIPPINES
Robert Sagun, Philippines, Taking =
IT Global=20
(Youth family; nominated by Youth focal =
point)
Chat Garcia Ramilo, Philippines, =
APC (Gender=20
family)
Susanna George, Philippines, Isis =
International=20
Manila (Gender family)
SRI LANKA
Dilanthe Withanage, Sri Lanka, =
Worldview=20
International Foundation (NGO family)
THAILAND
Sunit Shrestha, Thailand, Taking IT =
Global=20
(Youth family, nominated by Youth focal point)
IMPORTANT: Organisations named are =
those who=20
have accreditation to the WSIS process. These applicants could also =
be=20
representing other organisations besides those =
accredited.
As you can see from the above, many =
are still=20
not listed as having applied for fellowships. This includes Al =
Alegre and=20
myself who have actually already applied. In any case, I hope to get =
an=20
updated list from the secretariat soon. But in the meantime, =
what I need now from everyone is cooperation =
and input=20
on the following:
- for those who are still keen to =
register=20
yourself for fellowship. New deadline is 1st August but please =
register=20
immediately rather than leave this for later. Visit: http://www.geneva2003.org/wsis/documents/fellowship_form_civil_so=
ciety_prep3.doc">http://www.geneva2003.org/wsis/documents/fellowship_form_civil_s=
ociety_prep3.doc=20
- your name, country, accredited =
organisation=20
and family if you have applied but your name's not listed =
above=20
- specific nominations of people or =
groups whom=20
you know who should be applying but for some reason haven't. We do =
want to=20
give some priority to the Pacific. Please take note that there is =
already=20
a family/focal point looking after interests for Middle East =
and West=20
Asia so we do not need to include the Western Asia region.=20
- additional criteria if you feel =
that the=20
criteria listed in the Civil Society Facility Fund document is =
inadequate=20
or needs expansion=20
- a selection committe comprising of =
Asia=20
Pacific caucus members who can ensure balance of thematic/issue=20
representation as well. For this, I would suggest at least for =
youth, to=20
include Nick Moraitis if we are to follow this path. For gender, =
we could=20
have someone from the Gender Caucus or the NGO Strategies Working =
Group.=20
Others? We will also probably need to consult other focal points =
within=20
the bureau on indigenous peoples, NGOs, disabilities, =
etc.
Limitations due to =
funding
I would suggest having a shortlist =
of nominees=20
of 15 names, in order of priority or ranking for at least the last =
five as=20
funds may be insufficient. This listing should be balanced and as =
I've said=20
before include a couple of representations at least from the Pacific =
who are=20
keen to either conduct events at the Summit or at national level.=20
These are my suggestions, updates =
etc. Feel=20
free to comment and input. We need to make decisions I believe =
latest by=20
15th August.
I have copied this e-mail to the =
Civil Society=20
Bureau list to ensure transparency of decisions and =
processes.
Warm regards,
Angela