Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Fri, 16 May 2003 13:06:32 +0800
From:  "RunningToddler" <amkt@apcwomen.org>
Subject:  [communication 644] decisions by the region to be taken
To:  <communication@wsisasia.org>
Message-Id:  <013d01c31b68$ed263a00$767c063d@kryssq1o9vc6nq>
X-Mail-Count: 00644

Hi everyone,

I'm sorry that I have not been communicating much on this list. I =
thought I was on it then I was off it again for some reason. =
Mysteriously unsubscribed! In any case, I think I'd like an idea of =
who's on this list specifically from the Asia Pacific region. If Hamada =
or PatchA can help in this that would be great.

The reason why I'm writing is that there are basically three major =
decisions to be made. I believe Al Alegre did raise the issue of =
representation on the Civil Society Bureau at one time (before my =
hardisk crashed and lost all my e-mails). I'd like to raise that issue =
again. Currently, from PrepCom2 in Geneva, Al Alegre and myself, Angela, =
were elected to represent the Asia Pacific "family" on the Civil Society =
Bureau which is supposed to facilitate participation of our "family" =
members in the WSIS processes including off-site events. For more =
information on type of events, please visit the website: =
www.geneva2003.org and read up on the Civil Society Facility Fund.

The other matter that needs decisions is an indication of who/which =
organisations intend or want to participate in:
  1..  the July Intersessional 21-26 July, Paris
  2.. PrepCom III (15-26 September, Geneva)
  3.. The WSIS Summit (December 10-12, Geneva
Another key decision is whether as a region, we would like to respond to =
the draft declaration and action plan as a region. It would be great if =
those who were active in Tokyo during the drafting would want to take a =
lead in this. The content and themes sub-committee led by Bill McIver =
and Sally Burch have proposed that regional caucuses send their inputs =
directly to the WSIS secretariat by 30th May latest.

The third key decision is whether as a region, we'd like to have a side =
event during the Summit itself and book a space in Palexpo.=20

Other possibilities for the region which are off-site opportunities are =
outlined in the Civil Society Facility Fund document which you can find =
on the website mentioned above.

Do respond please. I believe Al should also express here his own =
sentiments about being on the CS Bureau, and whether there's a need to =
identify a third alternative?

Warm regards,

Angela

	

644_2.html (attatchment)