Adam,
Has this posed a problem that you are aware of?
If not, it doesn't seem to me a good idea to bring attention to a possible mistake that
nobody has noticed. The question can also be asked whether Glocom agreed to the
document (do you have authority to do this?) or even whether CRIS did (do I have
authority?).
bg
On Tuesday, 10 December, 2002 at 2:06, Adam Peake wrote:
> I hope this question is just being picky or my mistake:
>
> In our report and declaration, we used the words:
>
> "with representatives of 34 organisations from 16 different countries"
>
> and
>
> "the 34 participants have come to a consensus on the following
> vision, principles and plan of action."
>
> But, in the List of Participants we include the E-Asian WG, ITU and
> UNESCO, and looks like they make up 3 of the 34 participants. Also the
> Korean Professor, Kim Kio Chung.
>
> Did they agree on our document... If not, perhaps a clarification
> letter to Mr Asami is required, quickly? (we apologize for the
> implication that the representatives of these three organizations
> endorsed the document. They kindly spoke at the workshop and so were
> included in the list of participants. We did not intend to imply that
> they later supported the output of the workshop. We sincerely
> apologize for any misunderstanding. Please accept this edited report
> ?????)
>
> And send a new document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
> --
>
>