Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:48:59 +0900
From:  Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>
Subject:  [communication 103] Re: update on WSIS Asia agenda, etc
To:  communication@wsisasia.org
Cc:  izumi@anr.org
Message-Id:  <p05100308ba1a0f805fed@[203.170.145.229]>
In-Reply-To:  <Pine.LNX.4.10.10212091500180.26353-101000@spring.peacenet.or.kr>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.10.10212091500180.26353-101000@spring.peacenet.or.kr>
X-Mail-Count: 00103

Chun, thanks very much for this.

What does everyone think? Will this bring enough of an Asian flavor 
to the issue of cultural diversity?

Thanks,

Adam


At 3:05 PM +0900 12/9/02, Chun Eung Hwi wrote:
>Dear Adam and others,
>
>
>UNESCO session organizer is the following person.
>I had got this information from Korean commission of UNESCO.
>
>Axel Plathe
>Information Society Division
>UNESCO
>1, rue Miollis
>75015 Paris
>t       33.1.45.68.44.67
>f       33.1.45.68.55.83
>
>And I attache preliminary plan for their session.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Chun Eung Hwi
>------------------------------------------------------------
>Chun Eung Hwi
>General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 2166-2216
>Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
>Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun@peacenet.or.kr=A0=A0
>------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Adam Peake wrote:
>
>>  I spoke to one of the Japanese organizers this evening. As I
>>  mentioned earlier, we have been trying to get an update on the
>>  Agenda, etc., so we can brief the CONGO meeting on Tuesday (see
>>  <http://www.acsf.net/>)
>>
>>  Sessions on Monday, January 13. These are the responsibility of the
>>  organizer, the organizers have not changed:
>>  Session lead by UNESCO on cultural diversity, etc.
>>  2 sessions lead by UNDP on ICTs for development (see Bruce Girard's
>>  email, "Subject: [communication 084] UNDP panels", for more info than
>>  I have on this.)  At one time the organizer for these sessions was
>>  UNDP and Asian Development Bank, but seems ADB may (might) have
>>  dropped back from this task.  Not clear.
>>  Main change is that a session on the future of e-economy lead by the
>>  private sector may be held as a parallel session against 1 of the
>>  UNDP sessions.
>>
>>  I was not able to learn how to have input to any of these sessions
>>  direct to the organizers (it is particularly frustrating that we
>>  don't seem to know who at UNESCO is organizing, and how to contact
>>  them. Perhaps there will be a good UNESCO presence at the CONGO
>>  meeting and we'll find out there.)  The ministry did say that any
>>  suggestions about session content, recommendations for speakers,
>>  etc., could be sent to the main conference contact address
>  > <wsis@soumu.go.jp> and ask that it be forwarded.  If anyone does
>  > write to that address, you might also cc <ap-wsis@glocom.ac.jp> and
>  > we will try push.
>>
>>  January 14.  Still devoted to formal statements, lead by governments,
>>  the UN agencies, etc.  They are still open to civil society being
>>  given a couple of slots for statements (as they were at PrepCom1.)
>>  But they are still finding it very difficult to know who can
>>  represent civil society in this official format. Help with this is
>>  something that this mailing list (as suggested in Bangkok, etc.),
>  > next week's CONGO meeting, and probably the groups that will organize
>  > side-meetings in Tokyo  (Jan 11 and 12) might do. The slots are still
>  > there if we can come up with names and give the organizers some idea
>  > of why this person above all the other possibilities for civil
>  > society should be given a slot during this part of the agenda.
>>
>>  The session that was called the "interactive session" has now been
>>  renamed something like "wrap up".  It will be used for statements
>>  from the floor. Civil society will have an opportunity to speak up.
>>  But it seems to be loosing its discussion aspect. Important that this
>>  time remain available for reports from other conferences (like CONGO
>>  and the workshop from 2 weeks ago), and Tokyo side events to read
>>  their comments into the record.
>>
>>  That's about it.  No other changes since report of 2 weeks ago.
>>
>>  I still believe our way into the process is by offering substance.
>>  Imagine you were running a regional conference, you were expecting
>>  minsters of state from 20 plus countries, it's just  month away (a
>>  month of holidays), you haven't event got the agenda fixed.
>  >
>>  Thanks,
>>
>>  Adam
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>
>
>Content-Type: APPLICATION/MSWORD; name=3D"unesco.doc"
>Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10212091505540.26353@spring.peacenet.or.kr>
>Content-Description:
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=3D"unesco.doc"
>
>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:unesco.doc (WDBN/MSWD) (0009180C)


--